Feb. 4th, 2009 08:22 am
badgerbag: (Default)
[personal profile] badgerbag

What? Oh, that? No of course I'm not talking about that. It's just totally abstract.

Date: 2009-02-04 07:08 pm (UTC)
ext_134: by ladyjax (Default)
From: [identity profile] ladyjax.livejournal.com
Thanks for the clarification, I appreciate it. Sadly, my initial thoughts still stand.

Date: 2009-02-04 07:14 pm (UTC)
ext_28681: (Default)
From: [identity profile] akirlu.livejournal.com
No point in being swayed by facts.

Date: 2009-02-05 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tekanji.livejournal.com
No point in being swayed by facts.

Seriously? I mean, seriously?

Although I can't speak for [livejournal.com profile] ladyjax, it's pretty damn insulting to assume that she based her assertion only on that post and therefore to hold on to her opinion is to refuse to be "swayed by the facts".

The point (at least from where I'm sitting) is that when the assumption was that Teresa, not Patrick, had wrote it the post was yet another example of why Teresa's intentions shouldn't be trusted. That it's no longer on the table as evidence doesn't change that. From what I know of the issue, [livejournal.com profile] ladyjax has her "facts" pretty dead on.

Date: 2009-02-05 12:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tekanji.livejournal.com
To clarify, by "That it's no longer on the table as evidence doesn't change that," I was saying that it doesn't affect the original evidence that presumably led to [livejournal.com profile] ladyjax forming her opinion (and, believe me, there is more than enough evidence without that post to find Teresa's intentions questionable).

Date: 2009-02-04 07:31 pm (UTC)

June 2017

181920 21222324

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2017 12:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios