Abstraction
Feb. 4th, 2009 08:22 amhttp://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/ar chives/010999.html
What? Oh, that? No of course I'm not talking about that. It's just totally abstract.
What? Oh, that? No of course I'm not talking about that. It's just totally abstract.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 07:56 pm (UTC)Oh, go on. Tell us why the discipline of history is factual and universal and how that discredits postcolonial theory. And try not to blame postcolonialists for not adhering to the same theory as you. You wouldn't want to have a bad basis for communications or understanding.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 08:13 pm (UTC)The key phrase I was aiming at is "historical knowledge" in reference to whether tnh (actually as it turns out, pnh, but hey) is aware of Postcolonial prisions of the context of the term "cargo cult". That just looks a lot like assuming that the Postcolonial take is established fact -- something that counts as knowlege -- that one would be blameworthy for not knowing and taking into account. I'm just trying to say that it's dubious to assume that there is such a thing as "historical knowledge of the context of colonialism" that anyone outside of Postcolonial theory adherents is responsible for knowing and taking into account.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-04 09:16 pm (UTC)And again you're on a bad basis arguing "facts" as "something that counts as knowledge" (!?!?) "that one would be blameworthy for not knowing and taking into account" because what you're doing is holding up a set of universal values as the rug you want to pull out from under that whole problematic "Post Modern theoretical approach" from this subthread [Post Colonial variant]. Which, again: ironic on an order of magnitude beyond what you give in example in reply to