badgerbag: (action grrl)badgerbag ([personal profile] badgerbag) wrote,
@ 2009-08-31 02:41 pm UTC
Here's a good task for anyone not afraid of a little Wikipedia editing.

A search on the phrase "confined to a wheelchair". Let's reduce that from 383 results to 0...


(Read 32 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

hobbitbabe: (cloister)


[personal profile] hobbitbabe
2009-09-02 03:11 am UTC (link)
I went to do more "wheelchair-bound"/"wheelchair-using" and found that a couple of my edits from yesterday have been reverted with comments like "using common and accepted terminology" [Ghostbusters franchise], "unecessary change. wheelchair-bound is more formal and common" [Texas Chain Saw Massacre]. Is anyone else encountering this?

(Reply to this)  (Thread


zvi: self-portrait: short, fat, black dyke in bunny slippers (default, Me)


[personal profile] zvi
2009-09-03 08:15 am UTC (link)
As far as I could tell from the Wikipedia policies, there is a desire to be less offensive rather than more, and more specific rather than more generalized when it comes to issues of identity, but there doesn't appear to be a preference for more common terminology. Basically, tell whoever reversed your edits to stuff it, and re-revert.

You may also want to make a Neutral POV argument.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


kake: The word "kake" written in white fixed-font on a black background. (kake)


[personal profile] kake
2009-09-03 02:32 pm UTC (link)
Re the Texas Chain Saw Massacre, I've started a discussion on the talk page. I agree with [personal profile] zvi that "wheelchair-bound" is not a neutral point of view.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 32 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)